Although Phasha was ultimately acquitted of charges against him – a labour spokesperson said there was not enough evidence – the Department of Labour has admitted that it could have handled the disciplinary process better. As the custodian of labour issues, the department is our zero for the week for failing to set the example in how to deal swiftly and efficiently with employee matters, for not sticking to its own policies, and for abusing taxpayers’ money.
Even more disturbing is the revelation that Phasha was one of 16 officials suspended for lengthy terms on full pay by the department, a development that has cost taxpayers over R5.2-million, according to City Press.
In terms of the government’s senior management service handbook, which sets terms and conditions for senior officials in the public service, the employer must hold a disciplinary hearing for employees on suspension or precautionary suspension, within 60 days. The chairperson of the hearing must decide on any further postponements.
But Phasha himself didn’t help the process, according to Ian Hollis, the DA’s shadow minister for labour. In a statement Hollis claimed that Phasha had fired his lawyers twice, was absent without leave from a CCMA arbitration meeting, and used various stalling tactics to delay the completion of the disciplinary process.
“It is unacceptable that ordinary taxpaying South Africans are footing the bill for a suspended employee's salary,” Hollis concluded.
