Rational incentives are based on rational choice theory — the assumption that humans take decisions based on perceived costs and benefits and are driven mostly by their own individualistic, personal desires. Under this view, humans are assumed to think logically and by doing so they are able to take decisions in their own personal favour.
1. Use quick wins to demonstrate impact
Let’s face it: if you don’t feel that you can make a change then why would you try? People need to see that their actions have tangible results — only then can we keep them engaged or get them to engage in the first place.
We call this tangible result a quick win. To frame results as quick wins, you need first to turn big goals into smaller, realistic objectives. For example, a campaign for an anti-corruption law may start with supporting the election of clean parliamentary candidates before moving on to pushing for regulatory or legislative change.
Some concrete ideas:
- Follow Transparency International Georgia’s example and use incremental progress in cases through the court system and use media attention as quick wins. On one hand, people who reported to TI Georgia’s Advocacy & Legal Advice Centre (ALAC) said that small wins inside and outside of the courts were sufficient to keep them engaged and hopeful about finding a resolution to their grievance. Wins inside the court system contributed to people believing in the capability of ALAC lawyers and the justice system to make progress on their case. On the other hand, speaking on TV (or hearing allies speak on TV) contributed to people feeling better about their safety and the mere communication about the injustices they had suffered gave them a sense of relief.
- Inform people when public authorities took on board some of their suggestions or demands and celebrate these moments.
2. Make engagement informative and valuable
It is very straightforward: People will engage if the information they receive is clear, new and relevant. Information has to be clear for people to understand; it has to tell something new that they did not know before, and it has to be received by the people who care most about it. In the U.S., it was found that people are more willing to engage and deliberate in public affairs — among each other or with public authorities — when they were given accurate information that the system is less corrupt than they thought.
If people think they will get something in return, they are more likely engage. In order to incentivise volunteering, ReAcción, an NGO in Paraguay, trains high school and university students on basic administrative process such as learning about laws relevant to their voluntary work and how to use government open data portals and the group’s unique visualisation tools, and pressure points for influence. Students get new knowledge and skills for their efforts — and this training makes their work easier and more meaningful. Similarly, as part of the Integrity Pacts project, ActionAid Italy trains monitors on open data and mapping so that they have the tools they need to monitor the renovation of an archaeological site.
Some concrete ideas:
- Offer information sessions and training programmes on issues that people would value or on particular skills that people lack. Transparency International’s School on Integrity is a good example.
3. Offer rewards and limit costs
Can giving money to voters increase voter turnout? This might sound like a crazy question, I know! But the rationale of Stephen Carter, Professor at Yale Law School, is simple: why punish people who don’t vote when you could reward them instead? What does giving money to voters have to do with engaging in the fight against corruption? Actually, it follows the same logic — giving financial incentives to people will increase their engagement. This is based on how financial or material incentives work in getting people to adopt certain behaviour such as stopping smoking or in how lotteries are used to increase tax compliance in some European countries. Some countries including Ghana, Pakistan and the U.S. have actually introduced financial incentives programmes for whistleblowers.
There are, however, lots of reasons why it might not be practical or advisable to give people financial incentives to engage, but what you can do is make sure you limit financial costs that might act as a barrier to engagement. It is less likely that people will engage in an activity that costs them more than its perceived benefits. For example, if you invite people to a meeting during their working hours, they will be unlikely to join if they see the benefits of the meeting to be less than the costs of taking a day off. Therefore, you need to plan your engagement activities in a way that would maximise the benefits and limit the costs to the people you are hoping to engage.
Some concrete ideas:
- Consider offering rewards to whistleblowers, as long as this does not have negative implications.
- Offer a prize or a reward to the most engaged people. Transparency International’s Anti-Corruption Award or Accountability Lab’s Integrity Idol are good examples.
- Make reporting corruption cost-free by providing a toll free hotline or an email.
- Hold activities on evenings or weekends and in venues that are close to where people live.
- Provide people with the equipment that they need for their engagement activities.
4. Take people’s concerns seriously
You probably have a risk register for your organisation. But have you asked people about how they feel their engagement might be risky for them? Research shows that fear of retaliation is one of the main obstacles to citizens reporting corruption. Security goes beyond physical security to include digital and psycho-social security — which Tactical Tech frames as the holistic approach to security.
Some concrete ideas:
- To encourage engagement, especially at the early phases, use low-risk actions such as radio-call in shows, petitions or synchronised turning off lights.
- Inform people engaged in your activities about what legal protection they have and about the assistance you could provide.
- Ensure strict confidentiality of whistleblowers’ identities.
- Agree with your volunteers on a brief charter of roles and responsibilities, similar to what ActionAid Italy does with their civic monitors.
- Enhance your own organisation’s legitimacy. The more legitimate and widely supported you and your demands are, the less concerns people will have. This is one of the important things that ActionAid Uganda learnedafter the police raids in 2017.
5. Do not make engagement a waste of people’s time
How many times have you stopped doing something because you felt it was a waste of time? If, at any point, people feel they are putting in much more time than expected or relatively more than the perceived impact, they will stop engaging. Time is precious and is important to consider. This applies to all kinds of online and offline engagement.
Some concrete ideas:
- Make reporting of corruption less time consuming by designing a clear and concise reporting process and by removing any unnecessary steps.
- Give people a sense of how much time they can expect to invest, or simply discuss with them how to make their engagement manageable.